Embargo Watch

Keeping an eye on how scientific information embargoes affect news coverage

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

PNAS lifts embargo early on C-section study following Daily Mail story

leave a comment »

The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) lifted the embargo early yesterday on a study of Caesarean sections, after a story by The Daily Mail before the originally scheduled embargo time.

From an email from PNAS to its media list: Read the rest of this entry »

Advertisements

Written by Ivan Oransky

October 17, 2017 at 11:45 am

Posted in Uncategorized

PNAS lifts embargo early on study of extinctions, after author’s university jumps the gun

leave a comment »

The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) lifted an embargo early yesterday, after a university broke it with a press release.

From an email sent to reporters yesterday about an hour before the embargo was scheduled to lift: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

September 19, 2017 at 9:00 am

Posted in Uncategorized

PNAS lifts embargo early after news outlet runs typhoid fever story too soon

leave a comment »

The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) lifted the embargo early Saturday on a paper about typhoid fever, after a news outlet ran a story three days before the embargo was scheduled to lift.

From an email to the PNAS media list:  Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

August 21, 2017 at 8:10 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Here we go again: Why Nature didn’t just post a paper on stem cell editing after the findings leaked

leave a comment »

Last week, Technology Review broke the story of the first gene editing of human embryos in the U.S., using the much-ballyhooed CRISPR technique. That’s a big development, for scientific and ethical reasons, so not surprisingly, other news outlets jumped on it.

The coverage prompted stem cell scientist and blogger Paul Knoepfler to wonder who leaked the paper — which, as many knew but didn’t say because of, well, an embargo, was scheduled to be published today in Nature. (The Tech Review article was published July 26, and Nature didn’t post a pre-embargo version of the paper until a few days ago.)

The coverage also prompted Nature to include this in their embargoed email to reporters on Monday about this week’s issue: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

August 2, 2017 at 1:00 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Auburn University mix-up prompts PNAS to lift embargo early

leave a comment »

The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) lifted the embargo early Friday on a paper about sleep, race, and heart disease, after a university jumped the gun.

From an email sent at 4:16 p.m. Eastern on Friday, some 70 hours before the embargo was scheduled to lift today at 3 p.m. Eastern: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

July 31, 2017 at 9:30 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Five years on, eLife finds the lure of the embargo too strong

with one comment

Five years ago, then-new journal eLife announced that it would eschew embargoes — and my nemesis, the Ingelfinger Rule — in favor of unfettered scientific communication. I applauded the move — which I had some input into — then.

And for more than four years, as best I can tell, the journal stuck to that promise. But not in 2017. Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

July 20, 2017 at 9:30 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Embargo on study of how to retain women engineering students lifted early after break

leave a comment »

The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) lifted the embargo early Friday on a paper, after a news outlet broke it three days before it was scheduled to lift.

From an email sent to the journal’s media list Friday: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

May 21, 2017 at 7:48 pm

Posted in Uncategorized