Embargo Watch

Keeping an eye on how scientific information embargoes affect news coverage

Archive for August 2016

Motherboard loses embargoed access following Science break — which came on heels of previous probation

leave a comment »

motherboardI have an update on Monday’s post about an embargo break by Motherboard on a study in Science about how dogs understand language. Reporters at Motherboard — and VICE, Motherboard’s parent company — have been sanctioned for the break, and will lose access to EurekAlert!, provided by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), for six weeks.

[Please note this post — including the headline — has been updated. A previous statement by AAAS saying that Motherboard had been previously sanctioned was in error; AAAS told us this morning that the previous break had led to probation, not a sanction.]

It turns out Motherboard was just about to come off of probation for another recent embargo break. AAAS chief communications officer Ginger Pinholster tells Embargo Watch: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

August 31, 2016 at 9:00 am

Posted in Uncategorized

“Whoops.” Science lifts embargo early on dog speech processing study after break by Motherboard

leave a comment »

science 2014At 4:47 p.m. Eastern today, about three days before the embargo on this week’s issue was scheduled to lift, Science/AAAS sent out this email to its media list:

Effectively immediately, Science is lifting the embargo on the study, “Neural mechanisms for lexical processing in dogs,” by A. Andics and colleagues, because of an embargo violation by a registered outlet to which other reporter registrants have made us aware.

The Science Press Package Team and EurekAlert! take such violations extremely seriously and we will be following up swiftly with the responsible media outlet. We apologize for the inconvenience this issue creates for our registrants globally.

The embargo breaker? Motherboard, who had already taken the piece down, replacing it with this, (headlined “Whoops”): Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

August 29, 2016 at 6:18 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Good news: PNAS won’t embargo papers that have already appeared as preprints

with one comment

32.coverAbout a month ago, I suggested — based on an example of things gone wrong — that journals shouldn’t embargo papers that had already appeared on preprint servers. A little more than a week after that, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) seemed to agree.

And now, they’ve made it official. Here’s a note the journal sent its press list Friday: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

August 15, 2016 at 10:00 am