Embargo Watch

Keeping an eye on how scientific information embargoes affect news coverage

Archive for July 2016

Doing the right thing: PNAS decides not to embargo paper that had appeared as a preprint

leave a comment »

pnas juneOn July 8, following a bit of a clumsy episode involving the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), I urged journals not to embargo papers that had already appeared as preprints.

A week later, this arrived in my inbox: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

July 18, 2016 at 3:13 pm

Journals: Don’t embargo papers that have already appeared as preprints. Here’s why.

with 4 comments

pnas juneThe ever-changing world of scientific publishing can be a messy and confusing place, full of unintended, if not unanticipated, consequences. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) learned that today, the hard way.

Here’s what happened: PNAS had a paper on human evolution embargoed for this coming Monday, at 3 p.m. Eastern, as is their custom. But a little after 3 p.m. Eastern today, the journal sent out an alert to its media list saying that the embargo on the paper, “Genetic evidence for natural selection in humans in the contemporary United States,” was being lifted immediately.

Why? I asked. Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

July 8, 2016 at 4:09 pm

Posted in Uncategorized