The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) has lifted the embargo early on a study of drinking water near a contentious fracking site. From an email to reporters sent at 10:48 a.m. Eastern today:
Due to an embargo break, PNAS is lifting the embargo early on the following paper. All other articles are under the scheduled embargo: Read the rest of this entry »
Yesterday, at about 5:30 p.m. Eastern, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) sent out this message to its press list: Read the rest of this entry »
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) lifted the embargo early on a study appearing in The Lancet following an accidental break by Reuters.
From a 3:12 EDT email from the CDC press office: Read the rest of this entry »
Irony? Guardian piece promising “there can be no turning back now” removed “because it was launched too early”
Three or four times per year, a Google Alert lands in my inbox revealing a story in The Guardian that has been removed because it broke an embargo. One of those arrived today, so I tweeted a link to the story.
While looking at that page, Emily Lakdawalla noticed that a number of the related stories — presumably generated automatically — were also “removed.” One in particular caught my attention.
The headline said: Read the rest of this entry »
The holder of the Embargo Watch Short Embargo Record, with an impressive 49 minutes, has shaved another 11 minutes off its time. Today’s media list email, which went out at 4:22 ET: Read the rest of this entry »
The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) has lifted the embargo early on a paper on the effects of grape growing on biodiversity after a New York Times story went live hours before the scheduled embargo.
Here’s a note that went out to the journal’s media list earlier today: Read the rest of this entry »
The annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) is closely watched by reporters and Wall Street analysts alike, and that usually makes it good fodder for Embargo Watch. ASCO has changed its embargo policy regularly over the years, and this year is no exception.
According an email sent to reporters earlier this month: Read the rest of this entry »