From an email sent to media by the RSNA Saturday morning, November 23: Read the rest of this entry »
For this story, I sent Nature paper to Henrich for comment. He said he had paper showing same thing out in 2wks (1/3) http://www.nature.com/news/bigger-groups-mean-complex-cultures-1.14158
Yong, for those few of you unfamiliar, is the prolific blogger and longform science journalist who brings the world such stories as “These Sea Slugs Penetrate Each Other In The Head During Sex.” His tweets caught my attention, and before I could find the time to ask him for details for a potential Embargo Watch post, he’d sent me this narrative, which I agree is a nice story: Read the rest of this entry »
Usually when I quote messages from press offices on Embargo Watch it’s because of embargo breaks. But today I’ll quote a message from the JAMA press office for a very different reason: Read the rest of this entry »
There were no embargo breaks, however. An email went out to Science‘s press list on Monday: Read the rest of this entry »
From the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) press office this morning: Read the rest of this entry »
Due to circumstances beyond our control we are lifting embargoes on all European Cancer Congress press releases as of now. The abstracts are all online now, including late-breaking abstracts. They can be found here:
Therefore, for the remainder of the Congress we will email out the rest of our press releases either on the day of presentation to the congress or the press conference (whichever is earlier) and they will be for immediate release.
What happened? ECCO tells Embargo Watch: Read the rest of this entry »
Soon after I launched Embargo Watch in early 2010, various reporters and public affairs officers have asked me to gather the various “rules” I’ve suggested for embargoes into one place, using vignettes that illustrate how they’ve been broken. That always felt like a good idea, but not one I ever found time for.