Embargo Watch

Keeping an eye on how scientific information embargoes affect news coverage

New York Times, researcher won’t face sanctions for breast cancer screening embargo break

with one comment

nytLast month, as Embargo Watch reported, a New York Times op-ed by Dartmouth’s Gil Welch broke the embargo on a study Welch and a colleague were publishing the next day in JAMA Internal Medicine.

At the time, I wondered whether Welch and the Times would face sanctions. Now we have the answer.

JAMA’s editor-in-chief, Howard Bauchner, tells Embargo Watch:

After careful analysis it appears to have been a combination of human error and a misunderstanding of the precise time of our embargo.  I have been in touch with the op-ed editors of the NYT to clarify our embargo policy.

Written by Ivan Oransky

January 16, 2014 at 9:45 am

Posted in Uncategorized

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Perhaps the NYT is just too big to sanction.

    Michael Kenward

    January 16, 2014 at 10:02 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: