This afternoon, Denise Graveline — who knows a thing or two about embargoes and media relations, having held leading communications and media roles at organizations including the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency — pointed me to the “NASA Policy on the Release of Information to News and Information Media.”
Feel free to read that document at your leisure. When you do, you will find this section: Read the rest of this entry »
An arsenic bacteria postmortem: NASA responds, tries to pit blogs vs. “credible media organizations”
Last week, in the first of my posts on the NASA-Science-arsenic-non-alien-bacteria fiasco, AAAS director of public programs Ginger Pinholster left what I found to be an extremely thoughtful comment. In it, she reports on the findings of her team’s post-mortem (AAAS publishes Science). She concludes: Read the rest of this entry »
In yesterday’s post about the NASA astrobiology embargo fiasco, I cited one of my favorite scenes from Casablanca:
…in which Captain Renault is “shocked, shocked” to find out that gambling is going on at Rick’s, only to be handed his winnings by a croupier.
Turns out, unlike some of the speculation about what NASA was set to announce, I was much closer to the truth than I imagined. From an email sent out yesterday: Read the rest of this entry »
They’re apparently getting rid of narcissistic personality disorder in the next edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (aka DSM-V). Until that book comes out in 2013, however, I’m free to say that I was hitting all the criteria this week as loyal readers sent out Twitter versions of “Let’s Go Embargo Watch” chants.
You see, it was only natural for my legions of fans to shine the EmBATgo Signal. After all, all hell had broken loose over the news that NASA was about to report in Science that they had discovered extraterrestrial life.
Wait, that isn’t what they’re reporting? Read the rest of this entry »
Another chink in the Ingelfinger armor? Arsenic life talk forces Science to release paper early, without embargo
As this post goes live, so too go live two Science papers refuting the heavily criticized “arsenic life” paper published in the journal in 2010. (If you’re not familiar with the findings, I’d recommend Carl Zimmer’s excellent work on this subject, which he gathers here. You can read about the various embargo issues involving NASA and Science here.)
Embargo Watch readers may realize there’s something unusual about that.
Read the rest of this entry »
Embargo Watch readers have probably noticed by now that I’ve become far more concerned about the role of the Ingelfinger Rule in controlling the flow of scientific information than I am with embargoes per se. I’m still exasperated with inconsistent and bizarre embargo policies, but it’s the specter of Ingelfinger that I think looms larger.
So I went on high alert last week when Emily Lakdawalla, a blogger for the Planetary Society and winner of the Jonathan Eberhart Planetary Sciences Journalism Award, sent me this tweet:
@ivanoransky I thought of you today when B. Sicardy presented cool Eris results @DPS mtg today but said we can’t discuss b/c Nature embargo
I asked for more details, saying that didn’t sound consistent with Nature‘s embargo policy, which explicitly states that scientists can present at meetings, even if journalists are present, as long as they don’t court reporters’ attention.
The AAAS Office of Public Programs is lifting the embargo, effective immediately, on the article “A Diverse Assemblage of Late Cretaceous Dinosaur and Bird Feathers from Canadian Amber” by R.C. McKellar and colleagues, because this information has become publicly available. The embargo on the related Perspective, “Fossilized Feathers,” by M.A. Norell is lifted as well. Both articles are being published in the 16 September issue of Science and will be available
at sciencemag.org later today.
A summary of the article follows, and a copy of the manuscript is available at http://www.eurekalert.org/jrnls/sci/. The embargo is being lifted so that reporters may freely publish their coverage now. The rest of this week’s SciPak content will remain under embargo until 2 pm US ET today, 15 September.
Science‘s press office tells Embargo Watch: Read the rest of this entry »
Over at our sister blog, Retraction Watch, we report today on an Expression of Concern by Science about a 2009 paper purporting to link XMRV, or xenotropic murine leukemia-related virus, to chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). You can find details of that notice there. But Embargo Watch wanted to take the opportunity to commend Science for doing the right thing by releasing this material — originally scheduled for June 2’s issue — early.
As we note on Retraction Watch, Science told us it was a Wall Street Journal story that ran today that made them release the material early. The story reported that the authors of the 2009 study had refused to retract their work despite a request from Science: Read the rest of this entry »